The Duel (2016)

2/18/2018

Starring: Woody Harrelson, Liam Hemsworth, Alice Braga, Emory Cohen

Genre: Western, Crime, Drama

Channel: Amazon Prime Video

Problems present early for The Duel, with the movie poster showing the opposite name over the two lead actors.

Set in 1860-1880s Texas, the film opens with Woody Harrelson as Abraham Brant, responding to the duel against Jesse Kingston over the treatment of Mexican (and Mexican-American) people in the town of Helena. In this form of duel, the “Helena duel,” players tie hands as not to escape the other, and wield a knife in the free hand to stab their opponent to death. Brant wins and uses his victory, hateful politics and mystique to become the powerful leader and “Preacher” of the small Texas town.

Twenty-two years later the son of the fallen Texan returns to the town as an undercover ranger sent to investigate the disappearance and murder of several Mexican citizens. Liam’s character, David, first intends to leave his wife, Marisol, at home during his investigation because of the dangers, but later decides to take her along after fearing she might leave him. And so, the fear of being single is greater than the fear of being a widower. These are the values of our valiant ranger. Not to mention the amount of time he leaves his wife to be alone with the likes of Abraham and his followers to impress upon her.

Both the story and the acting leave much to be questioned and desired. Liam in particular feels very flat as a performer, using the same indifferent, monotone voice and face in every scene. It was as if the director said, “no matter the stakes, I want you to pretend it doesn’t matter.” The same can be said for his wife Marisol, played by Alice Braga. (Not to mention her own bizarre character arc). Their carelessness led to my own disinterest. Credit can be given to Woody, however, who was far more energetic and loathsome as his character needed to be, though the story gave strange allowances to some of his scenes as well.

For instance, he has an eerie ability of showing up out of nowhere, having not been seen or indicated to be nearby. In one particular fighting scene, Abraham miraculously appears and provides a gun for the unarmed contestant. Where the f*** did he come from! (At this stage we are also 50+ minutes into the movie and there’s no mention of the investigation or missing persons). Outside of that, he also materializes on doorsteps just as folks are coming or going.

Creepier still is the unexplained allure of his cult-ish, religious, malevolent hold on the visitors and townspeople. He paints tattoos on his eyelids and I don’t know why, nor do I have any idea why he has a boxful of snakes in the church during his sermon. All I know is they call him the Preacher and folks follow his leadership.

When David comes into town Abraham offers him position as sheriff, which is worrying on its own, but coupled with the idea that even if Abraham doesn’t suspect his visitor’s true identity, he’s handing him guns and lawful authority over the people. This can only end one of two ways: bad or worse. The plot falls short here because there are far better (and more believable) ways of handling this stranger.

When the plot finally reveals itself, David just happens upon it. There is no build-up or breadcrumbs or explanation as to how he got there, he just rides in and suddenly knows everything. The film falls apart more and more as the story progresses; I found myself taking aggressive notes in this final act.

This is where I’m going to stop because it’s just complaints and spoilers from here. Listen, don’t bother watching this movie. While I didn’t hate it, after all my questions I couldn’t help but wonder if I should have just watched something else.

5 Comments

  1. I too agree with your review of the movie. I think the story had potential to be really great, but instead consisted of random, unexplained/unexplainable back stories and sub plots. The only really good thing about the movie was Woody Harrelson’s acting….while I wanted to know more about his story, what he did portray was effective.

    Looking forward to reading your next review.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Hmmm….guess I still need to figure out how to properly leave a comment. I had generated a longer, more elaborate comment, but someone managed to delete it, rather than submit it. Anywho, here’s the shorter version.

    I too agree with your review in that it leaves much to be desired. I feel that the story could have been great if it was more developed….instead, I was left not really understanding how and why side stories were mentioned, but not explained. The only part that was clear, and made sense, was that a lawman was sent out to investigate a crime. I unfortunately then spent my time waiting to have everything else explained, which never happens. The thing I enjoyed most was watching Woody Harrelson portray his character well, as he is wont to do.

    Looking forward to reading your next review!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s